The Living Lightly people have grown happier. They have found a better model for living
at this turn of the century - a time when a handful of multinational companies have grown
more powerful than governments, the gap between the rich and the poor widens year by year,
and the competitive demands of an endlessly expanding global economy have come to rule our
lives.
We sought and found a growing global counter-culture of people convinced that the
global economy is not a blessing but a disaster - and who have found a better model for
the 21st Century.
We evaluated failure as well as success and we ended up more hopeful for the future. We
are convinced after our journeys that people would be happier in a thriving local economy,
providing basic food and livelihood for all, than the global one which changes food into a
commodity, destroys jobs, devalues cultures and devastates the human and natural
environment.
1. More or less radical lifestyles.
Voluntary Simplicity in Seattle, USA, downshifting in UK, Cohousing in the USA,
sustainable use of land at Tinkers Bubble (Somerset,UK) and Pure Genius (London);
self-sufficiency in North Wales and saving the wombat in Australia.
2. Better farms, better food.
The vegan and vegetarian arguments; Plants for a Future and Keveral Organic Farm
(Cornwall, UK). Community-supported agriculture in New England USA, Crystal Waters, the
worlds first Permaculture village in Australia.
3. Some answers to globalisation.
The realities of the global economy and the way it is being challenged in India with a
"peoples dam" (a small one). Urban self-sufficiency and co-operative
living in Tokyo, Bombay, Birmingham (UK), Utrecht (Holland) and Maleny (Australia).
4. Living in Community.
We live and work at The Farm in Tennessee, Findhorn in Scotland and Auroville in India
.
5. Connections.
The schools we visited include Virtual High in
Vancouver,Canada and, in UK, Brockwood Park, The Small School and Schumacher College.
After looking at the role of the Internet in Living Lightly culture, we draw conclusions
from our travels.
---------------------------
More and more people experience the world as becoming uglier, dirtier, less healthy
and less just. In rich countries, people appear divided into those who work too hard to
enjoy their prosperity, those who work, full-time or part-time, for pitifully low wages -
and those who have no jobs at all. As a result, more individuals are becoming interested
in alternatives.
How can we speak of living lightly in the Third World, where most people
are poor? In India we found boundless enthusiasm for Western-style comfort and affluence,
and we found people resentful that well-off travellers from a rich country should tell
them not to become rich.
They are right. You cant tell someone who wants a refrigerator that they can
manage with an ice-box, particularly not when youve always had a fridge yourself.
But we found that here, too, individuals and groups had begun to question the benefits of
the global economy and of so-called economic development.
Since the end of the second world war, millions of rural people who were poor by
industrial standards but led viable lives have become destitute, as the forests which
nourished them for centuries are cut down, water supplies are drained off for industrial
use or polluted, fish stocks are depleted by mechanised foreign ships, homes and lands are
drowned by a gigantic new dam.
Development of this kind forces farmers off their land into cities where
neither sufficient work nor adequate infrastructure awaits them. As a result, there are
people in the South (as we prefer to call the Third World) who are experimenting with
different approaches to development. In tune with the ideas of the Living Lightly culture
in the North, they are seeking home-grown solutions.
In India we visited pioneers with their own vision of what development
should mean. Not content with protesting against large dams which tend to benefit the
rich, they were building small dams. We found scientists, engineers and social activists
introducing equitable water distribution and organic farming into groups of villages. They
were not trying to return to a primitive past; they want technology to serve the needs of
living beings and of the planet.
In North and South, the pioneers in this book are changing themselves. They act on the
micro-level, at the grass roots. Most are practical people; some are technological wizards
who invent sustainable solutions for living better with less, and who network with each
other across the world by e-mail and through the Internet. They already belong to the
twenty-first century.
They hope that the tiny islands of better living which they inhabit will provide
examples which will eventually supplant the norms of unfettered global capitalism which
rule us today. Their hope is not in revolution but in persuasion by example.
Small groups of Living Lightly people are now part of an articulate and increasingly
purposeful global culture which promotes values that run counter to those of the
mainstream. We found such groups in the USA, Europe, Australia, India and Japan, with the
same aims, the same ideology - and using a similar vocabulary to describe it.
The words that matter are empowerment, community, sustainability, consciousness (their
word for a new awareness), and energy (their word for the spiritual power of group
feeling, not sources of mechanical power).
In different continents, in North and South, they envisage and practise similar
solutions: eco-villages (self-reliant and convivial communities), permaculture (a more
productive and sustainable way of organising homes and gardens), CSA (community-supported
agriculture), LETS (trading with a local currency), co-housing (living in your own home
while sharing basic facilities), and downshifting (voluntary simplicity). They rarely talk
about the environment, which they often see as a luxury protected by privileged people for
their own enjoyment: they are more interested in a world which allows everyone a good
life.
The Living Lightly people hold values which are based on a conviction that life has
meaning beyond the visible and measurable. Such perennial values continue to enjoin
reverence for all life, human and non-human, and therefore exclude the sort of
exploitation practised in the deforestation of the Amazon region, in a motorway destroying
a beauty spot, and in other profit-making exploits in the name of development.
Such values reinstate notions of community, beauty in architecture, local self-reliance
and living in a bioregional economy.
Living Lightly pioneers believe that the emerging global market is in effect a new
world empire worshipping false gods of consumerism and greed. They think the empire will
eventually disintegrate, as others have. In anticipation of that collapse, islands of
refuge must be prepared.
Whether a world-wide financial crash or an ecological catastrophe happens or not, these
experiments will serve as beacons lighting a route to the next century. The techniques of
sustainable living will have been perfected and tested in readiness for a time when
consumption has been uncoupled from greed and returned to its primary purpose of
fulfilling need.
Warnings of catastrophe can be exaggerated. Bigots and fundamentalists also talk about
islands of refuge against Armageddon. But in the past a few lonely prophets of doom were
proved right. The moral prophets of the Old Testament warned that a society with no
communal morality was doomed, and so it proved. The new Green prophets arent that
different. Voices like Wendell Berrys or Gary Snyders in the USA or John
Seymours in Britain are part of an unbroken tradition of prophetic writing. And
their prophecies are listened to and validated by movements in ideas, linked world-wide on
the Internet. There is a U-turn in what progress means.
We are less brave and adventurous than the Living Lightly pioneers, but like many
others in the North we yearn for re-involvement in community, for fresh, wholesome local
food and for a less destructive lifestyle. As we see urban households shrinking, children
degenerating into a spiral of crime and rows of grannies banished to old-age homes, we
want to rediscover, or re-invent, the extended family which is still the norm in much of
the South.
Each chapter describes a different set of experiences - except Chapter 8 in which we
set out the case against the global consumer economy, and Chapter 17, in which we reflect
on the role of computers and the Internet in a Living Lightly context . Criticism of the
global economy forms the underlying theme of our book, the viewpoint shared by the people
we write about and the justification for the changes in lifestyle which they have made.
Can these islands of success survive? Are they replicable for the rest of
us? These are the questions we were asking ourselves on our travels. Come with us on our
journey ...